11 Top Most LATEST JUDGEMENT OF SUPREME COURT - Target Judiciary

Our Target to achieve success 100 % in Judiciary Exams

Friday, 30 November 2018

11 Top Most LATEST JUDGEMENT OF SUPREME COURT

11 Top Most LATEST JUDGEMENT OF SUPREME COURT

11 Top Most LATEST JUDGEMENT OF SUPREME COURT

11 Top Most LATEST JUDGEMENT OF SUPREME COURT




1. Right To Privacy is a Fundamental Right.

#ADHAAR VERDICT - Not Compulsory (restricted use in PAN card, to file ITR, Govt schemes and subsidies )

#CASE :-

JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD.),AND ANR.VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.(2018, SC) ( 9 judges const bench unanimous judgement headed by CJI Dipak mishra )*Right to privacy is protected as intrinsic part of right to life and liberty....

*overruled the judgments in MP Sharma and Kharak Singh cases (privacy is not a fundamental right)...


2. Tripple Talaq Unconstitutional

#CASE:-

SHAYARA BANO VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (2018, SC ) (3:2 Majority )

*Unconstitutional and violative of Art 14 (Right to Equality)

*Against Shariyat and basic tenets of Quran

3,Women's Right To Love and to Reject

#CASE :-

PAWAN KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HP (2017, SC ) (Full bench headed by CJI Dipak Mishra )

*Right to life with Dignity and Freedom

*Individual Choice

*No one can compel a woman to love.

*She has Absolute right to Reject.

4. Sex With Minor Wife Is Rape...

#CASE :-

INDEPENDENT THOUGHT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (2017 ,SC ) ( DB )

HELD :-

*Sexual intercourse with minor wife ( below 18 years of age ) is Rape.

*Cognizance can be taken  in accordance with the provisions of S,198(6) Cr.PC which will apply

now to cases of rape of 'wives' below 18 years of age.

*Age of consent has been made 18 yrs frm 15.

5. Placing Ordinance before Legislature Mandatory : Re-Promulgation Fraud on Constitution.

#CASE :-

KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR (2017, SC ) (7 Judges bench )

HELD :-

*Re-Promulgation of Ordinances is fraud on the Constitution and subversion of democratic legislative processes.

*Satisfaction of president under Art. 123 and of the Governor under Art. 213 while issuing Ordinances is not immune from Judicial Review.

6. Decriminalizing Gay Sex and repealing S.377 IPC.

#CASE :-

NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (SC,2018 ) ( 5 Judges bench )
decided on 06 sept 2018 headed by CJI Dipak Mishra .

HELD :-

*Consensual sexual relationship between two adult(homosexual, heterosexual or lesbians ) is no more offence under S.377 IPC.

*Violative of Art. 14 of Constitution being discriminatory and unequal treatment to LGBT Community.

*Violative of Art .19(1)(a) of Constitution on account of unreasonable restriction on freedom of expression and choice of LGBT Community.

*Sexual activity by any human being with animal is punishable under s.377 and this portion is still constitutional.

*Each individual has an equal right to love whoever they want to..

7. Passive Euthanasia is permissible ...

#CASES :-

COMMON CAUSE (NGO) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (2018, SC ) (5 judges bench headed by CJI Dipak Mishra )

HELD :-

*Right to Die with dignity is a fundamental right.

*Permitting "living will" by patients on withdrawing medical support if they slip into irreversible coma.

8.ADULTERY is now NO CRIMINAL OFFENCE.
#CASE :-

JOSEPH SHINE VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (2018, SC )

(5 JUDGES BENCH HEADED BY CJI Dipak mishra )

HELD :-

*Violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution

*S.497 IPC will be struck down

*Every woman has her sexual choice.

*It can be a ground for civil issues like Divorce.

*Husband is not master of a wife.


9.Live Telecast of Supreme Court Proceeding..
#CASE :-
SWAPNIL TRIPATHI AND INDIRA JAISING (Sr.Adv.) VERSUS REGISTRAR OF SUPREME COURT AND OTHERS (2018,SC ) (3 Judges bench headed by CJI Dipak mishra )

HELD :-

*Live streaming of Court proceedings would serve as an instrument for greater accountability and formed part of the code of criminal procedure,1973.

*Intrinsic value of right to be heard under Art. 21 of Constitution.

*It is need of hour ( it will increase access to justice )

*It will encourage the principle of Open Court.

*Transparency.

10.MOSQUE is not part of ISLAM.

#CASE :-

M.SIDDIQUI AND OTHERS VERSUS MAHANT SURESH DAS (2018, SC )

HELD :-

*A mosque is not essential part of the practice of the religion of the Islam and Namaz (prayer) by

Muslims can be offered anywhere even in Open .

11. SABARIMALA CASE :-

#CASE :-

YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION VERSUS UNION OF INDIA (2018).

Read More :

No comments:

Post a Comment